Private message to Padma Patil
Feb. 15th, 2014 08:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, I thought the reception today went pretty well. Do you think Sandoval's pleased with how you're doing? Mr Crispin seemed pleased enough with me. I was trying to spot whether any of the sponsors were cross with their candidates. Yaxley was unhappy with Nott, that was clear. And Avery was not pleased that Weasley arrived so late.
Anyway, you know how we left our bags in the cloak room?
Have you looked in yours? Just wondering.
Anyway, you know how we left our bags in the cloak room?
Have you looked in yours? Just wondering.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 02:54 am (UTC)Sorry. I was reading.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 02:58 am (UTC)I've got some reading to do myself.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:07 pm (UTC)Thomas found a book, in his bag -- he told us to check our bags, too. It claims to be the original version of 'Pure Victory' but if you look in the back, there's a letter from Sirius Black.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:10 pm (UTC)No, it's not from Black, it's from BlaiseOH.
How did--
Oh.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:16 pm (UTC)Did you get one?
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:22 pm (UTC)I wish Professor Dovs had said specifically that it was a book, though. I've already had four second-years ask if they have to turn in their sweets.
I'll ask him to clarify.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:24 pm (UTC)Thomas got his at Sorcere.... You don't think this is part of the competition, do you? To see if people turn in something suspicious like that.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:38 pm (UTC)Good.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 05:42 pm (UTC)If it were a test, they'd have given it to all the candidates, right?
Also, there was this third-year I saw this morning who couldn't stop yawning. Almost like she'd been up all night reading something.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 07:17 pm (UTC)Were you even a little bit tempted to have a look at it?
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 08:22 pm (UTC)If I'd known about it, probably I would have gone ahead and had a look. Because I quite enjoyed the first two, and I'd like to know how it all ends, and I don't think some silly book is going to corrupt me or make me believe less in Our Lord's ideals, any more than it's going to corrupt me if I've read some of the Imposter Black's letters that show up in the journals.
Of course, I think the official version where they didn't let the editor muck everything up (wasn't that what they said happened when they recalled the original?) will be out really soon, isn't it coming this week? So I'll be able to see how it ends. In the new version.
And of course it makes sense, having everyone turn it in who might have it. I quite understand why they think idiots should be kept well clear of anything seditious.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-16 08:45 pm (UTC)I mean. If someone had a copy of each.